I appreciate the post, but in the end it just isn't that useful. It's like "I did all this stuff to sell MacBooks and didn't really make any money, so I started this startup."
Obviously you can't do it for long if you're not making coin, but either a more in-depth analysis of how many you sold for what prices, or any success / fail stories, would make this a more useful post for readers. Instead it's all the build-up of an objective study with no real payoff.
Hopefully this comes across as a useful critique and not something that's personally attacking. I like the idea, I just want something more out of a post like this.
The irony is that he says that immediately after "Selling on Craigslist sucks, it’s time consuming and you have to deal with flaky people that just want a deal." He's recommending exactly the behavior that makes Craigslist suck.
What he is saying is that the person is offering $X and when he arrives in person he counters with $X-50. (Probably more like offering $X-100 so you get a counter at $X-50).
Right... but if you agree to the price over the phone, don't negotiate in person. It's a dick move. If I'm selling my TV for $250, you agree to that, I drive to meet you and you low-ball me for $200, I hate you. It's that simple.
That's fine, because you've made your intentions clear. In that case, if I'm not willing to budge, I'll let you know that, and we can avoid a meeting. I've had people do it exactly as I described, and it's an infuriating waste of time for me.
Perhaps not, but it's not unheard of. "Smart" bargainers sometimes resort to tactics like that, because they figure since you've already come this far to meet them, you'll lower your price just to get the deal over with. Which I generally won't do on principle, because that pisses me off.
If I'm meeting with you to sell you something, it's because we agreed on a price already. If you try to bargain with me after the fact, I'll just say "No," and leave. You've violated my trust and broken the deal.
Properly speaking, this is not arbitrage. There are two criteria for arbitrage, it has to be riskless and self-financing. Looking at an item and saying, I should be able to sell that for more is not an arbitrage. If you were able to locate a buyer willing to pay a certain price prior to purchasing the item, and then buy an under priced item and sell it to your buyer for more money, that would be arbitrage. Arbitrage is a sexy three dollar word that people like to throw around, but if you are risking loss in order to hopefully make a profit, then plain and simple it is not arbitrage.
What basis are you using for saying this is StatArb? Typically that involve hundreds or thousands of equities where you can use the laws of large numbers to your advantage. Buying one item that is below the average price of something and "hoping" you can sell it for more just doesn't strike me as any type of real arbitrage.
StatArb has no dependency on equities. This is arbitration, Arbitration between two markets, his local craigslist market and the rest of the online market. There is no hoping, hes priced the item in one market and it is above the price of another, that is pure arbitrage.
Slightly unrelated to the blogpost, but how do your cameras work in low light settings? I'm looking into a similar system for a business my wife and I run.
Obviously you can't do it for long if you're not making coin, but either a more in-depth analysis of how many you sold for what prices, or any success / fail stories, would make this a more useful post for readers. Instead it's all the build-up of an objective study with no real payoff.
Hopefully this comes across as a useful critique and not something that's personally attacking. I like the idea, I just want something more out of a post like this.